Jack Rickard

Another thing I believe is missing is updating dependencies whose types are part of your public API.

It depends on whether we expect anyone to be doing real-time correction of the errors. There are definitely benefits to just erroring out as soon as we see the first...

Now I've explained it I think it's less likely to be useful, and really the chances that we get an incorrect SPIR-V module should be really small, as they will...

Thanks! I'm reasonably convinced that *some* form of readiness needs to be built in now, but I going to work through things just to check (and hopefully it will help...

`poll_ready` interacts really poorly with GATs, I had an attempt with a Service trait that looked like this: (`ReadyToken = ()` gives you a pure GAT-ified version of the Service...

I had a go at implementing tokens (without GATs) in #631, and I'm much less convinced that the idea in #412 can work, I think the split traits (with GATs?)...

I've been mulling over this for a while now and Amos' recent(-ish) article (https://fasterthanli.me/articles/futures-nostalgia) has pushed me to come back to it. I've come to the conclusion that my main...

@Aloso I've added a note to the alternatioves section about `?MetaSized`, but as Scott says the lang team have been opposed to these so this RFC is intentionally written to...

@clarfonthey > Since the general consensus on the syntax is... very mixed, it might be worth focusing on `MetaSized` and it's semantics first, and maybe delegating the exact way to...

@tgross35 I agree with what CAD97's said, I'm confused by your table and don't understand what you're trying to convey. `Sized` implies `MetaSized` (in fact I'm now convinced that it...