Simon

Hello, Don't know if it helps but the code above compiles fine replacing: ```cpp return py::make_iterator(v.values, v.values + 3); ``` with: ```cpp return py::make_iterator(v.values); ``` (wich will then look for...

It seems that the introduction of forwarding reference in 2.10.0 for: ```cpp iterator make_iterator(Iterator &&first, Sentinel &&last, Extra &&...extra) ``` tends to favor the selection of: ```cpp iterator make_iterator(Type &value,...

Could #4105 be related to this ? (as the signature of py::make_iterator is changed ?)

> > Could #4105 be related to this ? (as the signature of py::make_iterator is changed ?) > > I think it's almost certainly a different kind of breakage. The...

Hi there. Is this issue still relevant ?

Thanks for the answer! There is interest from my part but the fact that there is not wide interest makes me wonder... :wink: I'll try to have a look and...

I've tried a few lines of code which fit my needs on this branch : https://github.com/Simon-Lopez/cgal/tree/call_visitor_for_patch_border_splitting commit: https://github.com/Simon-Lopez/cgal/commit/b0d925ed119547cf1799d3a6ebe8fb7b45d81182 I'm not really sure about where to call `after_edge_duplicated` and with which...

Hi @sloriot. Thanks a lot for your quick answer. From what I understood, the functions `*_edge_split()` are called during the corefinement step when an edge is splitted into two edges...

>but my instinct is that the C++ library for surfe would use cmake to build it instead of the steps in setup.py My two pences (sorry for that) : if...

MTP, don't know if this will help. We faced the same problem at my organization and there was no obvious answer (different behaviors were observed). - as @agiudiceandrea above I...