SidharajU
SidharajU
@dipankar-ba @lguohan Please review
In the current implementation (without the proposed changes), there is no relation between secure flow, secure channel and the macsec_port_id/port. MACsec user is not able create a flow or secure...
> please add PR description I have added comment about the description: In the current implementation (without the proposed changes), there is no relation between secure flow, secure channel and...
> This change does not allow using a MACsec flow for multiple MACsec ports. Instead of binding a MACsec port to a MACsec flow, can a MACsec port be bound...
So are we moving back the MACsec port id from MACsec SC to Flow. There is already an implicit relationship between MACsec port -> ACL table -> MACsec flow ->...
Thanks Dipankar. @helloanandhi Are you okay with the current changes based on Dipankar's explanation?
Based on today's discussion in the OCP SAI meeting, its best to return all supported FEC modes by the chip. In certain cases, supported FEC modes should be known to...