Sebastian Köhler

I wasn't able to get the parse method in packaging to work, but here is how I (after a lot of trials and errors) got all of the creators from...

Here's my solution: https://github.com/futurepress/epub.js/issues/950#issuecomment-1031800157

Looking very much forward to hydration support for i18n blocks. I was hoping this would have been included in v17 ...

Thanks for your reply! I use it in a service in Angular like this: ``` import { Injectable } from '@angular/core'; import JsonURL from '@jsonurl/jsonurl'; @Injectable({ providedIn: 'root', }) export...

``` Warning: C:\Users\sebkoh\Documents\GitHub\digital_edition_web_ng\src\app\services\url.service.ts depends on '@jsonurl/jsonurl'. CommonJS or AMD dependencies can cause optimization bailouts. For more info see: https://angular.io/guide/build#configuring-commonjs-dependencies ``` It's the Angular `@angular-devkit/build-angular` builder that produces the warning. It's...

My guess is that this originates from Stencil, and apparently the Ionic team is working on improving the Stencil SSR performance: https://ionic.io/blog/coming-soon-new-updates-features-for-ionics-open-source-projects Let's hope the current Stencil work will fix...

I also pinned version 8.2.2, which is fine for now. Thinking about moving to Angular Material, but it's so much work in the case of my project.

Still get the error in Ionic 8.6.0, though slightly different: ``` TypeError: this.attachShadow is not a function at ctor.createShadowRoot (C:\Users\xxxxxx\GitHub\ionic-angular-ssr-attachShadow-typeError\dist\app\server\main.js:1:180912) at proxyHostElement (C:\Users\xxxxxx\GitHub\ionic-angular-ssr-attachShadow-typeError\dist\app\server\main.js:1:241935) at patchElement2 (C:\Users\xxxxxx\GitHub\ionic-angular-ssr-attachShadow-typeError\dist\app\server\main.js:1:243771) at patchChild2 (C:\Users\xxxxxx\GitHub\ionic-angular-ssr-attachShadow-typeError\dist\app\server\main.js:1:243843) at...

OK so the conversion is successful if I change the mode from ``` ``` to ``` ``` which I think is a bit counterintuitive, since if I omit the sample...

OK, thank you! I think the reason I don't get the sample values is that I also have this in my ODD: ``` ``` This clears the in-built values of...