Steffen Hoening
Steffen Hoening
@michaelsauter @metmajer @clemensutschig Is a feature like this in consideration with more then 3 environments for 4.x?
I meant stages like DEV -> TEST -> QA -> PROD. Three PROD deployments in different regions should be sufficient.
Yes of course. I should explain the purpose of the "stages". DEV: Is used for Development. The developers can have a look to the outcome of their work and do...
Regarding separate PROD deployments: Yes exactly, that is correct! Regarding separate DEV namespace. How would a setup with separate DEV namespace look like? The idea was to create the (immutable)...
@michaelsauter I had a look at #535. For me the main advantages of the release manager are: 1. Create a single version for the whole bundle for the systems and...
@michaelsauter Thanks for your fast response! May I ask that you share your doubts? Probably I am not aware of a pitfall.
I agree that if you just include some dependency subtree is the way to go. But if you also own the component and want also to push code back gitmodules...
@michaelsauter Thank you for your comment. Yes, an operator installed some CRDs, which are not related to ODS a ods project and we don't want to deploy them via ODS....
Indeed this is a very good question. Think of some resources that might be already qualified in a different way. I mean including them could be a new feature but...