Robert Spigler
Robert Spigler
ACK d6d634094744569d99b35bbb20f295ecdfda32bc I see `prioritize_no_change` bool under the `options` argument for `send` as well as `fundrawtransaction`. Need to do more testing with spending different UTXOs. A GUI PR would be...
So something like the `maxapsfee`? How does this conflict with BnB improvements?
`maxapsfee` is a config option that specifies the maximum amount of extra fees a user is willing to pay to avoid partial spends
I think that is the issue, yes. > [dnsseed] [addrman.cpp:612] [AddSingle] [addrman] Added 1.0.0.1:18444
Can this be reopened? Thanks
I don't have this issue on a fresh install of Debian on a new laptop, so it's either Qubes specific, or my-machine specific, so I'm closing.
Strong concept ACK! Glad this is getting a fix. As discussed in 17190 and OP, there's more improvements that can come after this.
Would like to test but don't know how, as this PR doesn't yet change how descriptors are stored or outputted. Any ideas?
tACK commit 057511d35375bada45a9b71b7e06db1edcb34091 Computing checksum of the multipath descriptor: `getdescriptorinfo "wpkh([2fb36ae6/84'/0'/0']xpub6Bpt6XP21UMYtMC7xjKsMYorev7si6TY3QfqFf3jLP6LvTcdV66DGnGcW6TZWduhMBKBqC8XykFj5zKPXvS4TasoeHYsozqqdfH1ZZ7fZMK//*)"` > { > "descriptor": "wpkh([2fb36ae6/84'/0'/0']xpub6Bpt6XP21UMYtMC7xjKsMYorev7si6TY3QfqFf3jLP6LvTcdV66DGnGcW6TZWduhMBKBqC8XykFj5zKPXvS4TasoeHYsozqqdfH1ZZ7fZMK/0/*)#ljnxrhyu", > "descriptor_change": "wpkh([2fb36ae6/84'/0'/0']xpub6Bpt6XP21UMYtMC7xjKsMYorev7si6TY3QfqFf3jLP6LvTcdV66DGnGcW6TZWduhMBKBqC8XykFj5zKPXvS4TasoeHYsozqqdfH1ZZ7fZMK/1/*)#wxk87z5y", > "checksum": "ava8ef96", > "isrange": true, > "issolvable": true, > "hasprivatekeys":...