Rick Minerich
Rick Minerich
Hi Christoph, I was wondering how things were looking with native sparse provider support. Are there smallish predefined chunks of work that need to be done? I may be willing...
I really like the idea of base fields for union types. This would save a lot of extra objects and/or duplication we have going on right now. Struggling to find...
Just thinking out loud, it would be nice if we could expose an API over DUs for consumption from C# so that if we want to change the representation somehow...
This is a pretty neat trick!
Hrm, what about something slightly more general purpose. I'd like to be able to do this with object expressions.
This seems like not a bad compromise. No idea how much work something like this would be to add to SRTPs though.
I would love to have this. In particular it's useful for the pattern of picking a certain set of operator overloads in some tight context.
This is a pretty neat idea, I'm not sure where I'd use it though. What about named parameters like with methods? e.g. `type MyType`
It would be nice if these pragmas could follow normal scoping rules.
I don't hate this, but I don't love it either. Do you really think the small change will bring over people? I've never heard anyone say "I don't use F#...