Prithvi A Pai

We may have transport other than MCTP. So spdm_transport_none_lib would be helpful in that case.

I checked the provided links. I see the support only for VCA. However, other APIs are still require support is that correct ? what is the plan for supporting all...

> We need some one validate and confirm that split is working, before we move too far. > > @PrithviAPai , can you help to try the new API? Hi...

@steven-bellock @jyao1 can this be supported ? The PR added is NOT helping as transport encoding is not done and Receive part is NOT correctly handled. BMC is designed to...

yes, existing library can work as it is till encode/decode transport messages. Post which we can make sure the integrator takes care of sending and receiving the API. This helps...

@steven-bellock up to transport layer encoding/decoding can be as we have currently. But, integrator need option to send/receive without having callbacks called for the same.

@steven-bellock can you please tell us some rough timelines when this will be available so that we can plan our deliverables accordingly ? Thanks a lot for your support and...

@steven-bellock please suggest if this looks good. ```SEND PART``` 1) Integrator to acquire ```SenderBuffer```. 2) Integrator to call ```libspdm_build_spdm_request``` 3) ```libspdm_build_spdm_request``` to build spdm request + add transport encoding 4)...

@Wenxing-hou Is there possibility to have ```libspdm_process_response``` which can internally call ```handle_version_response```, ```handle_caps_response``` or ```handle_algo_response``` ? @steven-bellock please share your suggestion.

@Wenxing-hou I did test these APIs and here are some of my findings: https://github.com/DMTF/libspdm/issues/2480 Please let me know if you need any logs.