Princess Cheeseballs
Princess Cheeseballs
> I redid the logic for tracking reagents to just be in response to any solution container updates, and that seems to work okay. It's not quite as simple as...
> I switched the update loop to be always one second (regardless of metabolic multiplier), so it's only an error of at most that, and I feel like that's reasonable?...
> Isn't the sub-second accuracy still necessary for food eaten off a stasis bed that you then get onto (or emagged but opposite)? With quantization to a second you would...
> Okay, let me make sure I'm understanding your idea correctly—the circumstance I'm imagining is: > > 1. Person eats two bites of burger, with like 0.9 seconds between each...
> By the way, I unironically love how in-depth we're going for this being mechanically consistent for something that really "does not matter" in a certain sense. It's so silly...
> Yeah, that'd definitely be best but I feel like that really adds a lot of processing overhead for a benefit at that point even I can't justify. (You're iterating...
> Oh, I see what you mean—but yeah, it'd still be a lot more overhead (though I wonder if it gets balanced out by how many update loops that run...
> > If you want the extra challenge go ahead and try that > > > > I'll be real all I want is my friends to stop asking me...
> Me four days ago: > > > It’s a pretty simple fix > > past me is such a liar NEVER trust anything reagent related to be simple.
Hey are you still working on this? If so I can review soon if you address the merge conflicts.