PROBOT
Hi . I would like to work on this issue.
is this issue still available ? the previous PR seems abandoned
ACK [`95969bc`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32243/commits/95969bc58ae0cd928e536d7cb8541de93e8c7205) Approach looks good to me and this test also adds coverage to line we seem to miss in non-fuzz tests Missing line in unit and functional tests coverage...
Concept ACK for the test While we are trying to add another orphan transaction when the max amount is reached , why are we dropping a random orphan and not...
If needed I can also push my script to generate corpus from `libFuzzer` that create the corpus according to the considerations if the reviewers deem it worthy .
> I wonder if we should include this coverage data in our codecov output in PRs...On the one hand its not "reliable" coverage data in that we aren't actually testing...
> > I would prefer to not add it in codecov until we have a good public corpora of fuzz inputs to run the report on. > > One reason...
added this script to run in CI .
`1.63` versions are failing because `llvm-cov` requires `1.65` , other 2 failures are because of storage issue on the CI instance.
Failure caused because of no storage left on the ci infra