Philipp Balzarek

I'd be willing to work on this if there's a chance that it would be merged. I believe just adding the "bot" prefix as a breaking change and bumping the...

In the stackoverflow discussion HeinrichApfelmus said > Note that if several networks are allowed, then it is problematic to return a Behavior from [run], because you could try to use...

Not having a (canonical) way of getting Events and Behaviors from one MomentIO block to another would make the whole idea pointless, though, as one could only create disjoint networks....

I actually banged my head against this a while back and came up with something that seems to work: https://github.com/Philonous/reactive-banana/commit/2ff7317e50348d2221f66875bbf5c6a7e747e900 . If this is the right way to go I...

I would love to, but the problem was I couldn't figure it out myself, sorry :sweat_smile:

I'm working on it. This isn't as obvious as I first thought. * Since 3.0 `Socket` doesn't container the address family any more, so I can't check it to return...

> Why don't you use getSocketName to get its SocketAddress type? * AFAIK Windows doesn't allow `getsocketname()` on unbound sockets. [1] Windows doesn't have `AF_UNIX` either, so the code could...

I've been working on this, but I've been stuck on https://github.com/haskell/network/blob/26e9d3cd57587e3f102d7bf722c18edc3e7172ae/Network/Socket/Buffer.hsc#L125 I think the idea here is that for connected sockets, `recvfrom()` and `recvmsg()` don't return the remote address, so...

Is there a plan how to deal with legacy code that relies on the old syntax? I have inherited a significant code base written in the old style and it's...