Paris Liakos

Thanks for the quick response! I am sorry, it is not clear what i talk about, indeed. I talk about GeanyPy itself. Everytime i start the editor it is disabled...

ok, i moved it to `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/` and it now works. is that normal behavior? probably i messed up setting the prefix during installation?

Oh, good news! being added in geany-plugins means that we will get a package for it soon in debian i guess. will make it even easier @evgeni Here it is...

Now it is in the list only once, but still it will show unchecked in the plugin manager. [plugins] load_plugins=true custom_plugin_path= active_plugins=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/addons.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/classbuilder.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/geanygendoc.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/editorconfig-geany.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/geanyextrasel.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/geanylipsum.so;/usr/lib/geany/geanypy.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/geanyvc.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/geniuspaste.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/geanyprj.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/saveactions.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/spellcheck.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/splitwindow.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/tableconvert.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/geany/treebrowser.so;

This will get to be a bit easier when gotham eventually switches to hyper 0.12 and the `http` crate, where `deconstruct()` is replaced by [::into_parts()](https://docs.rs/http/0.1.5/http/request/struct.Request.html#method.into_parts) and [::from_parts()](https://docs.rs/http/0.1.5/http/request/struct.Request.html#method.from_parts). Right now you...

It is not released yet. See also #26

Good suggestion. We should also make user/pass optional in the constructor and then in send() check: if username/password AND cookie are not defined, give an exception with a nice descriptive...

I am pretty sure those parameters only work from UI. The API does not support them yet...

Yes, i am very interested to it, but havent find the time to implement it. Definitely on the roadmap but needs some research initially.

That would actually be awesome, yes..That way the same client can be used. Definitely a very good suggestion!