Omar Castro

Hello, first of all, sorry for my inactivity, I am now going to give some input on this

I am a proponent of "Do one thing and do it well", so I believe keeping rofi and rofi-blocks separated, or in a more accurate way, not integrated, simplifies maintainability...

> Also I am still not able to run the action. I am using [this workflow](https://github.com/NamrataJha/actions-test-3/blob/main/.github/workflows/delete-old-packages.yml) for testing. The action is not able to fetch `package-version-ids`. > > > >...

I have been testing this feature with success using this [workflow](https://github.com/OmarCastro/github-actions-test-3)  One thing I noticed is the minimal information on the logs, only total number of versions deleted. With...

I have developed this feature in a fork. I am aware of action matrices, and the code clutter that will be added to the code. But I still believe it...

Hi, Thanks for trying at least :+1: I think, and will assume, you mean `highlight` instead of `active`, but is a good name, if not better, that `selected`, since you...

I did play around with it, and decided to implement with @fogine input, it had less edge cases to worry than the `active` on the line. About the invalid index...

The -p command is a dmenu specific option as you can see on the command `rofi -show run -p "aa"` the prompt is not changed, so this is not a...

The most future proof way is to prefix a cmdline argument with **-blocks**, so I decided to use **-blocks-prompt** to define the initial prompt as to prevent the initial flash

Hello @BelkaDev I am having difficulty in understanding what is your objective when you are saying about dmenu. As far as I can tell, rofi has support for dmenu using...