Nicolò Lucchesi
Nicolò Lucchesi
Hi, any news or follow-up on this feature? Is there any further optimization we could benefit from with the on-going transition to Shapely 2.0..?
Hey, any news on the state of this feature?
Hey, despite @jorisvandenbossche absolutely legitimate and functional warning against using a custom geodataframe subclass, my experience in using it for quite some months now at work is that it comes...
Hey @m-richards, thanks a lot for your response and your insights! My implementation is indeed based on 0.10.0 and it relies on a custom `_constructor`to create instances, as suggested (at...
Hi! I could probably port this multi-gpu feature, but I would appreciate some pointers as to where in the code I should look for the actual model (I am using...
> ``` > self = > size = 4, read = > > def _recv(self, size, read=_read): > buf = io.BytesIO() > handle = self._handle > remaining = size >...
Hi @mathfac, thanks a lot for your thorough review. I understand there needs to a series of changes in order to add this contribution to core and I'm totally on...
Thanks a lot for your help, the Cython approach looks promising in speeding-up operations on datasets. I'll take a look at the code and see if I can lend a...
I didn't think about the possibility of getting back up to 10 points per polygon, that's kind of a problem to work with such jagged arrays.. do you think it...
Okay I can see some utility in having a fast function although limited to even resolutions; furthermore, if I understand that correctly, pentagons should only appear at the vertices of...