Nariod

I just found out that using the "inline-execute-assembly" option allows to circumvent the problem:  PS: data shown on the screenshot are from an internal lab, no data leak here.

Is it possible to review/merge this PR ? I'd love to use Exegol with podman instead of docker. All the best, Nariod

Sorry for the delay, back from engagement (using Exegol

> I just tried your branch `feat/podman` but encountered an error : > > ``` > user@localhost-live:~$ exegol start test-podman light > [*] Exegol is currently in version v4.3.0b1 [9f371802]...

@polluxtroy3758 , on first try :  Then, on second try: 

To sum it up, in order to have a working Exegol with podman on an up-to-date Fedora 39: ``` sudo dnf install podman-docker python3-pip sudo systemctl enable --now podman.socket git...

Hi @whokilleddb , Nice, I will have a look to your dev branch too ! I just used the tool (main branch) to load Mimikatz against a well known EDR,...