Myks92

Great!) The only thing is there is no example when validation occurs on the API server with an example response: ``` { "errors": { "chatId": "The value should not be...

@kotarella1110 It seems to me that it is worth looking towards the second resolver, apiResolver and trying on the Chain pattern: ```js const resolvers = resolverChain([ zodResolver(schema), apiResolver(request) ]) const...

@kotarella1110 > Do you have any specific proposals in mind regarding this matter? So far I do not know how to handle server errors. In your validation context, we should...

After thinking about the validation, I thought that it might be related not only to the actions of the server. It can be used to make a request to the...

@kotarella1110, I already like this option. Looks good!

Perhaps it is also worth giving developers the opportunity to transfer not only FormData, but also any other data to the validator. ```js const data = {id:1, name: 'User'} validator.validate(data)...

I met the same problem during installation. For security, the vendor assembly is required first, and then I copy the assembled vendor and configs to production. When using this bundle,...

> Yep, we need a recipe. Thanks for the ping, I'll do that this week. Thank you. Waiting for recipe.

Да, можно сделать так, я об этом писал выше: > Сейчас же такое можно реализовать с выделением подмодуля, но это не то что нужно. При таком использовании получится, что `modulite`...

Yes, you're right. It can be done that way. I think it's worth adding it to the documentation. It's good that you're also supportive with table naming. The `rbac_` prefix...