Mike-Devel

> Because even the trivial move has observable side-effect (the address). Could you elaborate on that? Obersvable to whom?

Isn't that an issue with the type having an incorrect copy/move constructor? If my type holds a reference to itself, then that reference should definetly be updated during copy or...

Just to clarify: I opened these issues exactly because I was hacking on gil (more precisely because I want to compile some boost libraries with a custom toolchain for a...

> Please, let's stop discussing rules of public consumer-oriented CMake configuration for a library in Boost.GIL. Well the thing with OS software is that your consumers are sometimes/often working on...

I probably should have been more explicit. I meant only the files for classic **OR** for v2 **OR** x3 from this repository. IIRC, bcp will not distinguish between them.

x3 seems to also have some dependencies on `boost/spirit/home/support/` e.g. here: https://github.com/boostorg/spirit/blob/e14eaa3057a48776371a557631422deeb0ad81de/include/boost/spirit/home/x3/char/char.hpp#L11-L14. Thank you very much for the script that will be very helpful. Seems like GitHub has eaten some...

Would it make sense to go even one step further and separate each version (classic, v2, x3) into a separate repo? Or are v2 and x3 closely coupled?

Have you considered moving to mp11 (for the cases where std c++14 facilities are not enough)?

My observation on that topic is is this: 1) With or without glob, you have to make sure that cmake gets rerun, if you add or remove a source file....

@azias : I think the native cmake support I was talking about was only added in VS2017. And yes, I don't agree with the statement in the documentation (and I'm...