m.bell

> Is this actually tested in the CI tests I added this to make sure we're testing this code path (and confirmed with debug logging that it does indeed run...

> Interestingly, though, it doesn't seem to repro the issue on `master` It looks like it did repro the failure over here (in my GitHub) https://github.com/TechSmith/buildcache/runs/4034140731?check_suite_focus=true#step:10:4076 Maybe we have some...

Sorry I never followed through on this - I don't think I'm going to take the time to do so at this point.

My two cents is that when you have a closely-related dependency tree like this, it makes sense to just put them in the same repo. You can always put them...