Maria Shaposhnikova
Maria Shaposhnikova
@arjan-h , please review this PR. I have decided to keep all information in one document not to force users to switch between documents. I find it easier that the...
@Keraito , I've reviewed new function documents. Please double-check that everything is technically correct.
Hi @Grasshooper, Thanks a lot for your feedback! Since the document talks about nanoflows, we have deleted information about the error event that is not available in nanoflows. Best regards,...
@tknippenberg , please review the PR.
@tknippenberg , thank you for the review! I have rewritten sentences that you had comments on.
@Luyao-Zhang-1 , could you please take a look if the Developer Portal part looks good to you?
@ishan1729 , @PaulJongenMx , I have reviewed the PR, please take a look.
@timvandervoornmx , thanks for the review! I did not use the term "sub-workflow" for two reasons: 1. We use terms "called microflow" and "calling microflow" for the microflow editor. 2....
Hi @mauritselzinga-mx , thanks for submitting the PR! A few questions about extensions: 1. We currently have documentation on add-on modules and solutions for SP, how is extension different from...
Hi @mauritselzinga-mx , I've reviewed the PR. Based on your answers on extensions and after a discussion with other tech writers, I suggest the following: 1. I've moved all info...