Marcel Wilson

I ended up forking the project as an alternatively named package primarily for myself but went ahead and published it to pypi in case it's useful for anyone else. ([selenium-axe-python](https://pypi.org/project/selenium-axe-python/))

@m8ttyB I'm not against paid libraries, but unfortunately it would be a non-starter for my projects (one of which is also open source). Personally I would love to see `axe-selenium-python`...

I agree a separate github org would make the most sense. One **very** minor correction, I'm not affiliated with Django. I use the axe in conjunction with selenium. I mention...

Thank you @KaylaHood! Does it make sense to try to add a unittest which verifies all the expected methods are present in the stub? There are also some missing imports...

I tweaked generate_stub.py to fix the issues with missing imports, staticmethods, and classmethods. https://gist.github.com/MarcelWilson/bf830e853b54a59603013d50a801d948#file-generate_stub-py Here is the stub output: https://gist.github.com/MarcelWilson/ca6eaa52f91015c3bc2abbe5a442d6de#file-proxy-pyi I took the liberty of removing the docstrings as they...

> the testing will have to be overhauled. After a while is it going to make sense to keep the old logic which allows users to pull down older webdrivers?

Do we know if the changes to chromedriver will apply to the chromium variants? i.e. Edge?

I haven't looked at this yet, but figured I would try to tackle it this week. But before I do, I have to ask if anyone has tried the selenium...

In case it's useful to anyone else besides me, I ended up forking the repo and publishing it to pypi as `selenium-axe-python`.

Any chance this can be accepted, merged, and pushed to pypi?