Mahmoud Samir Fayed comments

Results 6 comments of


                                            Mahmoud Samir Fayed

Zig cc generated wrong executable code for switch statement when (-Ofast) is used

@silversquirl I am use Clang and Zig on Windows Clang (Windows) doesn't have the problem Zig (Windows) have it I think this requires attention at Zig project level Tested building...

Zig cc generated wrong executable code for switch statement when (-Ofast) is used

I added (-Ofast) in this commit: https://github.com/ring-lang/ring/commit/90ad2071925f8cb563d99b3e44adc5cf858a8e6d The problem doesn't exist when using (Clang) in windows while (-Ofast) is active

Zig cc generated wrong executable code for switch statement when (-Ofast) is used

@ehaas We already use -o2 on macOS and we don't have this problem: https://github.com/ring-lang/ring/blob/master/language/build/buildclang.sh

Zig cc generated wrong executable code for switch statement when (-Ofast) is used

The warning is related to a function implementation called Random() Doesn't have anything to do with the reported bug. The bug doesn't appears using my old Clang version: Apple clang...

Zig cc generated wrong executable code for switch statement when (-Ofast) is used

@nektro I am trying to find a way (workaround) to still use Zig/Clang and (Ofast) flag and avoid this issue

Zig cc generated wrong executable code for switch statement when (-Ofast) is used

Hello I applied a workaround to avoid the problem so I can use Zig cc Or Clang & keep the -Ofast flag - The workaround is applied in this commit:...