Kyran Gostelow

Results 125 comments of Kyran Gostelow

Just something along the lines of: ```rust let event_loop = EventLoop::new(); let mut context = Context::new(WindowBuilder::new(), &event_loop); event_loop.run_return(...); // Works thread::spawn(||{ event_loop.run_return(...); // Doesn't work, weird graphical artifacting and whatnot...

Please reopen @himekifee

Working on supporting Lithium. Currently trying to figure out what is and isn't compatible via Lithium's config. This is not yet exhaustive. ```properties mixin.ai=true mixin.item=true mixin.math=true mixin.shapes=true mixin.tag=true mixin.block=true mixin.chunk=true...

Hmmmm... Above gets big errors & crashes sometimes... going to be arduous to figure out what does what. Probably going to need to take it quite slow. Will work on...

Getting this from something: ``` [STDERR]: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException [STDERR]: at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:1013) [STDERR]: at java.base/java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:967) [STDERR]: at java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection$1.next(Collections.java:1049) [STDERR]: at net.minecraft.class_5572.method_31762(class_5572.java:40) [STDERR]: at net.minecraft.class_5573.method_31774(class_5573.java:127) [STDERR]: at net.minecraft.class_5573.method_31777(class_5573.java:1038) [STDERR]: at net.minecraft.class_5573.method_31773(class_5573.java:127) [STDERR]: at...

> Using the lithium API could help to fix issues related to entities. Thanks, could you point me in the right direction for that perchance? What does the API allow?

> @KyGost it's the work of @himekifee , on your side you can do nothing except findind and disabling problematic mixins. Not quite sure what you're implying?.. I can manipulate...

I have not yet drilled through them all (see below, those without a phase haven't been tested) but here's a functional list of mixins (see #20 for more info). Raw...

I'll continue narrowing down the list but the main improvement for compatibility that can be done is fastutil concurrency improvements (see also: #19). I would expect this to allow: -...

I'd expect this to be a **WontFix**. No point in having a much lesser mod, dim thread is good as it is far more stable but there is no gain...