Krzysztof Filipek

Results 22 comments of Krzysztof Filipek

From my investigation there are gcc 8.x releases available: | OS| gcc ver| |:----------:|:-------------:| CentOS 8.4.2105 | [gcc 8.4.1-1](https://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/centos/8.4.2105/appstream/x86_64/Packages/gcc-8.4.1-1.el8.x86_64.html) RHEL 8 | [gcc 8.2.1](http://rpm.pbone.net/info_idpl_49191458_distro_redhatel8_com_gcc-c++-8.2.1-3.3.el8.x86_64.rpm.html)

Sure, I've updated the PR #825 with proper changes.

@igchor Related PR (#825 ) was merged to the master branch. Can we close this issue?

Hm, can we set "property" in easy way or rewrite it? ```cmake # Configure the ccache as compiler launcher find_program(CCACHE_FOUND ccache) if(USE_CCACHE AND CCACHE_FOUND) set_property(GLOBAL PROPERTY RULE_LAUNCH_COMPILE ccache) endif() ```

With -O3 still it's not optimized. Simply as is: ```cpp int main() { try { throw PolymorphicException("Error: ").decorate("Bonjour"); } catch(const std::exception &e) { std::cout

> Add a new experimental storage engine PSKIPLIST, contributed by 4Paradigm. > > * PSKIPLIST is based on a persistent skiplist introduced in a [VLDB21 paper](http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol14/p799-chen.pdf) worked with Dennis Wu...

I've compiled this branch using W11 and VS 2022, and this issue is not reproducible. My compiler version: ``` The CXX compiler identification is MSVC 19.34.31933.0 ``` Since Jan 2023,...

Sounds like things done in script from AE, I thing we can use their parts of code.

@igchor I believe we realize this by finalize, right?

Here is a short overview what is possible on newer Java in case of finalize deprecation. [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52879761/should-java-9-cleaner-be-preferred-to-finalization](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52879761/should-java-9-cleaner-be-preferred-to-finalization)