Judit Knoll

It seems like during the merge, this feature in the CHANGELOG.md got to the wrong place, not to the unreleased section, but into 4.7.2.

> > @KengoTODA? > > I'm not so active recently so please ask other teammates for review. You may check my post at the spotbugs team: https://github.com/orgs/spotbugs/teams/everyone/discussions/11 Thank you for...

As far as I can tell, every change requested by KengoTODA got addressed, but the github still shows that there is 1 change requested by him. Is there any change...

The issue is recreated and fixed in https://github.com/spotbugs/spotbugs/pull/2887.

I tested your detector on some bigger projects: - [Bt](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/java-static-analysis/reports?review-status=Unreviewed&review-status=Confirmed%20bug&detection-status=New&detection-status=Reopened&detection-status=Unresolved&run=SpotBugs%20on%20Bt%20%28user%3A%20sajtizsolt,%20branch%3A%20MET04-J%29&is-unique=off&diff-type=New&checker-name=IAOM_DO_NOT_INCREASE_METHOD_ACCESSIBILITY), - [MatSim-Libs](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/java-static-analysis/reports?review-status=Unreviewed&review-status=Confirmed%20bug&detection-status=New&detection-status=Reopened&detection-status=Unresolved&run=SpotBugs%20on%20MATSim-Libs%20%28user%3A%20sajtizsolt,%20branch%3A%20MET04-J%29&is-unique=off&diff-type=New&checker-name=IAOM_DO_NOT_INCREASE_METHOD_ACCESSIBILITY), - [NanoHTTPD](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/java-static-analysis/reports?review-status=Unreviewed&review-status=Confirmed%20bug&detection-status=New&detection-status=Reopened&detection-status=Unresolved&run=SpotBugs%20on%20NanoHTTPD%20%28user%3A%20sajtizsolt,%20branch%3A%20MET04-J%29&is-unique=off&diff-type=New&checker-name=IAOM_DO_NOT_INCREASE_METHOD_ACCESSIBILITY), - [OpenGrok](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/java-static-analysis/reports?review-status=Unreviewed&review-status=Confirmed%20bug&detection-status=New&detection-status=Reopened&detection-status=Unresolved&run=SpotBugs%20on%20OpenGrok%20%28user%3A%20sajtizsolt,%20branch%3A%20MET04-J%29&is-unique=off&diff-type=New&checker-name=IAOM_DO_NOT_INCREASE_METHOD_ACCESSIBILITY), - [Ttorrent](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/java-static-analysis/reports?review-status=Unreviewed&review-status=Confirmed%20bug&detection-status=New&detection-status=Reopened&detection-status=Unresolved&run=SpotBugs%20on%20Ttorrent%20%28user%3A%20sajtizsolt,%20branch%3A%20MET04-J%29&is-unique=off&diff-type=New&checker-name=IAOM_DO_NOT_INCREASE_METHOD_ACCESSIBILITY). I think I found an FP type in MatSim-Libs (e.g. [this one](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/java-static-analysis/report-detail?review-status=Unreviewed&review-status=Confirmed%20bug&detection-status=New&detection-status=Reopened&detection-status=Unresolved&run=SpotBugs%20on%20MATSim-Libs%20%28user%3A%20sajtizsolt,%20branch%3A%20MET04-J%29&is-unique=off&diff-type=New&checker-name=IAOM_DO_NOT_INCREASE_METHOD_ACCESSIBILITY&report-hash=a8b296c38e42937ad584c726c15ed2b7&report-id=2999833&report-filepath=%2Fproj%2Fcodecheckerci%2Fjava%2Fspotbugsci%2Fmatsim-libs%2Fmatsim%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fmatsim%2Frun%2Fgui%2FPopulationSampler.java)):...

> @JuditKnoll Can I run CodeChecker with the demo account? I really can't find any way to do it. The demo account doesn't have rights to store the results. If...

> > > @JuditKnoll Can I run CodeChecker with the demo account? I really can't find any way to do it. > > > > > > The demo account...

Seems like the build is failing, can you please run `./gradlew :spotbugs:spotlessApply` command to solve the spotless problems?

Thanks, @mofleury! Then I'll close this issue.

The link provided in the title did work for me flawlessly, so I'm closing this issue.