Jordi Manyer Fuertes

The solution I now have is ```julia function to_parray_of_arrays(a::AbstractArray{

Yes, leave it to me. I'll try to get time for it over the next few weeks.

I would start reading some of Gridap's asssembly-related code if I were you. The files containing most of what you want are `CellQuadratures.jl` (mostly for setting up integration), `Assemblers.jl` (mostly...

@amartinhuertas Yes, this is something I already encountered in the past. We discussed it, and we ended up agreeing that we will probably have to remove most template parameters from...

Hey @simonsticko, I've managed to reproduce the error. For some reason, the code is not allocating the elemental contributions correctly (creating float-based arrays instead of complex-based arrays). A complete fix...

@oriolcg AD is not supported by GridapDistributed yet (and never was). We have a working prototype, but it's not part of the library. Although the error you point out is...

@JanSuntajs Have you tried replicating/running [this test](https://github.com/gridap/Gridap.jl/blob/master/test/ODEsTests/DiffEqsWrappersTests/DiffEqsTests.jl)?

@JanSuntajs I am using the master branch of Gridap, and the DiffEqWrappers still exists. I don't know if it works, since the test file I pointed at does not run...

@christopherfear When you are creating your initial condition `initial`, you are using ```julia MultiFieldFESpace([V0_Disp; V0_PF]) ``` which is your test `FESpace`, i.e it has zero dirichlet boundary conditions. I would...

Hey @amartinhuertas ! After having a look, don't you think this is a feature and not a bug? This is the code that is run when evaluating a `CellField` on...