JonathanBechtel
JonathanBechtel
> i thought both were right, and pinv is more efficient. > and i thought the third row(113) should be > V.T.dot(...) > maybe a typo? I looked into it...
Also, for what it's worth, I think the current solution in place is a bit more 'expressive' than just using `np.linalg.pinv(X)`. They both ultimately do the same thing, but assuming...
@Div12345 So I am beginning to take a fresh look at this issue of the feature importances for the TimeSeriesForest, and this has not been fixed yet. Any interest in...
Thank you, will take a look at this.
@korosig Thank you for writing. I'll look into it.
@fkiraly After PR #4272 gets accepted I'll work on one for `TimeSeriesForestRegressor` and `ForecastingRandomizedSearchCV`
Thanks. Hadn't thought about the detail of it being a public facing function, will submit a PR with that in mind.