JonathanBechtel

Results 7 comments of JonathanBechtel

> i thought both were right, and pinv is more efficient. > and i thought the third row(113) should be > V.T.dot(...) > maybe a typo? I looked into it...

Also, for what it's worth, I think the current solution in place is a bit more 'expressive' than just using `np.linalg.pinv(X)`. They both ultimately do the same thing, but assuming...

@Div12345 So I am beginning to take a fresh look at this issue of the feature importances for the TimeSeriesForest, and this has not been fixed yet. Any interest in...

@korosig Thank you for writing. I'll look into it.

@fkiraly After PR #4272 gets accepted I'll work on one for `TimeSeriesForestRegressor` and `ForecastingRandomizedSearchCV`

Thanks. Hadn't thought about the detail of it being a public facing function, will submit a PR with that in mind.