Jorge

Hi @MilesCranmer it's being a little while, I like your idea a lot! it looks simple to implement, although when I'm trying to implement it i run into some errors:...

Thought about it. The problem is that in this particular case. the parameter can be anywhere between two values [a,b]. Is just that the variable is measured, but not controlled....

Sure! Actually im using a little different idea. I can simplify it as follows. Right now this is how is working: ```{python} class ExactGPModel(gpytorch.models.ExactGP, GPyTorchModel): _num_outputs = 1 def __init__(self,...

Hi @Balandat, thank you for your valuable insights! Upon reflection, my situation aligns more closely with your first point. In my context, the time required for experiments (labeling trials) significantly...

Just wanted to thank you @Balandat for your help and guidance. Im still learning the framework so it was a little hard to get done. In any case, ill share...

I got time to think about this: "One difficult thing about implementing this is that the loss function is recalculated only when expressions change. So some of the losses may...

Actually, just forcing reinstall made the issue go away. But ill keep this issue posted in case I see any more issues

I reinstalled the prime tool itself: ``` uv tool install prime --force-reinstall ``` then everything went smoothly, I may had an older version in my computer which was causing the...