Jamie Mason

good spot, thanks 👍🏻

Thanks @robross0606, the `expect/build/jasmineUtils` issue should hopefully now be fixed in [[email protected]](https://github.com/JamieMason/expect-more/releases/tag/expect-more-jest%405.4.1). On dependencies, `expect-more-jest` defines its runtime dependencies at: https://github.com/JamieMason/expect-more/blob/1289cfb4193bf1eac57e7762a37dda8b1dd0c0fc/packages/expect-more-jest/package.json#L10-L14 Something I'm not completely sure about that you can...

Thanks a lot, on my mobile just now but what I would want to do is instead put this behaviour in a new matcher called toBeNilOf, and maybe also add...

Hey Nick, I think this could be related to #51 in that expect-more-jest doesn't understand asymmetric matchers when it receives one as an argument. This needs to happen, but until...

You're welcome Nick, thanks a lot. Receiving asymmetric matchers as arguments is a pretty big oversight I hadn't thought about, but it'll be do-able I'm pretty sure.

Hey Rob, expect-more-jest doesn't currently understand asymmetric matchers when it receives one as an argument. This needs to happen, but until that is released we will need to only provide...

Thanks @manuman94, I do plan to eventually rewrite Jasmine-Matchers in TypeScript but it will take time. In the meantime I wrote [a newer version in TypeScript for Jest](https://github.com/JamieMason/expect-more/tree/master/packages/expect-more-jest/#expect-more-jest) – but...

Thanks a lot @manuman94, you're welcome – it's really great to hear of it being used.

Do you have an example repo somewhere I can look at @manuman94 to try and help? Also, have you seen the TypeScript example at https://github.com/JamieMason/Jasmine-Matchers/tree/03bc19b4170dad265684f112f3a90f5d97fd6998/examples to compare against?

I've not attempted this before @dave-dm, I would be interested though if you manage to find any documentation on this.