Jan Romann

@sergiou87 The reordering and squashing features are very awesome, thank you for adding them! I think at the moment there are mainly two features missing to get a very good...

> @JKRhb, they already added two if I understand you correctly. There is a checkbox to amend a commit. Hmm, but this way you can only rename the latest commit...

> > > Do you have any roadmap or a draft plan regarding the update of the library? We could also help to create a community around the project so...

> > > Sure thing @JKRhb! I'd very thankful for any contributions and would be happy to merge them into WoTPy. Just make sure to include some tests for the...

@fatadel Hi! I started to work on this topic on [this branch](https://github.com/JKRhb/wot-py/commits/thing-model) in my fork (in which I also intended to add TMs, hence its name) but I am not...

@fatadel I've opened #25 now so that the work on this issue is more transparent :)

Do you think this issue is already resolved with #113? Or do we need some additional logic for correctly handling TCP? I noticed that RFC 8974 introduced a new concept...

> I also think this PR might not be working right now, it's creating the endpoint in the client with the URI from the _first_ request, the endpoint doesn't change...

cc6257c1f09d05ebebf28cd9c2c47bbb70254d9f fixes the multiple endpoints issue, caching them by URI host, port, and scheme. This does not allow proper socket reuse yet, but at least the solution is not completely...

@JosefWN Thank you for your thoughts on this issue! I think I will convert the PR to a draft for now, as the current API works and discussing the concrete...