RobC
RobC
@praveenkumar - The latest release nodes are still saying that only podman is supported - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_local/2.5/html/release_notes_and_known_issues/minimum-system-requirements_rn-ki Can you confirm which version includes support?
It looks like it does fall back to the default location but still uses the auth set. Using the following ``` [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry] [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry.headers] X-Meta-Source-Client = ["azure/aks"] [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry.mirrors] [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry.mirrors."docker.io"] endpoint =...
After some further work with @mikebrow we have managed to get some interesting debug. With the following configuration ``` [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry] [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry.headers] X-Meta-Source-Client = ["azure/aks"] [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry.mirrors] [plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri".registry.mirrors."docker.io"] endpoint = ["https://registry-1.docker.io", "https://appconnect-docker-local.artifactory.swg-devops.com"]...
Looking at the logs, it appears that when we are doing the fall back, it makes the second `do request` BUT it doesn't `fetch response received`, it just switches back...
I am guessing its in this section (https://github.com/containerd/containerd/blob/master/remotes/docker/resolver.go#L535) ``` if err := r.authorize(ctx, req); err != nil { return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "failed to authorize") } resp, err := ctxhttp.Do(ctx, r.host.Client,...
We have some more information. it looks like it's the association of auth is that failing here. With the following configuration we are able to pull from our artifactory registry...
I'm seeing this as well i.e. if I have the following json object ``` {"type":"basicAuth","username":"mockuser","password":"mockpass"} ``` if you were to have code such as ``` barAuthParsed, err := gabs.ParseJSON(contents) log.Println(barAuthParsed.Path("type").String())...
While I agree in an ideal world everyone out there would build arm versions of their products but we know thats not going to happen thus why Apple made sure...
> Running a full openshift amd64 instance won't be possible on the M1. Running an openshift arm64 instance, and starting some amd64 images on it might be doable, but I...
> What is the likelihood of getting arm64 builds of this IBM Operator Catalog? Zero - The cost would be extremely high. It's not just the catalog that needs to...