Guilhem Niot
Guilhem Niot
It doesn't seem to be related to `JMSAopBundle`... You can see the changes done in 1.2.0 [here](https://github.com/schmittjoh/JMSAopBundle/compare/1.1.0...master). Did you update another package at the same time?
Fixed in https://github.com/schmittjoh/JMSAopBundle/pull/34
I could merge a PR, but this bundle is no longer actively maintained and I unfortunately won't have time to make the necessary changes myself.
Well there is no plan to, we need someone enough motivated + has the time to create a PR. > What is missing here to work with version 4? This...
Is this ready to merge? Or are there still some things to cover with tests?
ping @greg0ire
what do you think @schmittjoh ?
Well this makes new annotations to support for a very small benefit...
I'm wondering if we should not create a new `ServiceMetadata` class or just use the `Definition` class directly...
@schmittjoh What do you think about having a new metadata class ? something like `ServiceMetadata` which would contain all the linked fields instead of having an array.