Google Code Exporter

``` I'd like to see this feature too. Would also be willing to have a crack at submitting a patch. Neil Horner ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 23 Apr...

``` I'd like to see this feature too. This problem is also reported at: https://code.google.com/p/keepnote/issues/detail?id=259 and https://code.google.com/p/keepnote/issues/detail?id=294 ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 30 May 2013 at 2:20

``` Forgot to specify the version of the program ... KeepNote 0.7.9 ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 25 Mar 2013 at 10:59

``` I have a same problem. If external authentication fails, next provider should be used. It is a very important feature. Please implement it. ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on...

``` Can a ConcurrentWildcardTree be used for url routing with parameters? like /home/products/*/tab/*?color=* ? ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 16 Jan 2015 at 9:19

``` I'm planning to take a different/better approach than discussed above to support multiple wildcard queries, when I eventually get time for this. Basically a potentially better way to support...

``` This is a good suggestion, thanks! There is a subtle difference though in how contains might be implemented. In your example above, "TO" was never added to the tree...

``` If "TO" would return true (even if it was never added explicitly) this would fit my need =) Your option 1: With my example above: return tree.getKeysStartingWith("TOAST").hasNext() would return...

``` edit to my last comment: If contains("TO") would return true (even if it was never added explicitly) this would fit my needs =) ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on...

``` (Why can't I edit my comment? Sorry for multiposting...) A combination of both would work: return (tree.getKeysStartingWith("TO").hasNext() || tree.getValueForExactKey("TO")) return (tree.getKeysStartingWith("TOAST").hasNext() || tree.getValueForExactKey("TOAST")) both return true. Maybe you can...