Google Code Exporter
Google Code Exporter
``` It's really unsafe to run this sort of test as root, right? ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 5 Nov 2012 at 6:50
``` BTW, the reason I removed that statement is that getuid() test isn't portable, i.e., the special case was difficult to maintain. That and I think it's unsafe. ``` Original...
``` If it is unsafe, then maybe something should warn the user not to run 'xdelta test' as root? ``` Original comment by `ajpl.delacroix` on 5 Nov 2012 at 5:33
``` If there was a portable way to detect whether you are running as root, we wouldn't have this problem. ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on 18 Nov 2012 at...
``` Xdelta can't do what you're expecting it to do in the general case. Also, I do not believe Xdelta will skip re-applied single patches. Xdelta is written to read...
``` hello, i have almost the same problem. I make on xdelta3 a file who upgrade old one but after second applying file corrupted. On attach i got a screen,...
``` OK. There must be some non-determinism or difference in behavior between lzma versions. I'll relax the test a bit. This looks pretty harmless. ``` Original comment by `[email protected]` on...
``` This still persists in xdelta 3.0.8, at least in Debian. $ xdelta3 test Xdelta version 3.0.8, Copyright (C) 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Joshua MacDonald Xdelta comes...
``` This is a nice idea. The Inserts, Deletes, and Replacements you mentioned are not computed internally or expressed, because that is a fundamentally different problem. But, it would be...
``` But VCDIFF has three instructions, add, copy and run: by numbering the instructions in any given delta and listing them to a file, this would generate the required list...