Matteo Sumberaz
Matteo Sumberaz
@Ruteri I agree that `ERROR` is misplaced and we should just mention that we already saw that deposit or that vote.
I think the proposed solution looks good.
@scravy yes, sorry for not being precise.
I agree with @cornelius, since there is no easy fix and is not critical, it might even never be fixed. from [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-02-07-19.01.log.html#l-52): > 19:25:41 If we really wanted a blog...
The problem is that you are gonna accept those votes without being able to validate them, you are still safe from spam (since a validator can only vote once per...
@Nizametdinov I think we can make it an opt-out feature instead. @scravy As for the maturity imho the stake does not need and should not have any cooldown (this would...
This seems extremely relevant. Good find!
@scravy ADR sounds good to me.
@amiller that's a very good point. We probably don't want to ban the node then, just prevent block relay.