GkvJwa

> @bebuch > > Hello @cdacamar , sorry to bother you, but could you please let me know if the implementation of P2564R3 is in your team near plans or...

> > the _Literal_zero_is_expected function is used as an exported function. > > The body of a `consteval` function should not cause ASM generation. This looks like a bug of...

> > > the _Literal_zero_is_expected function is used as an exported function. > > > > > > The body of a `consteval` function should not cause ASM generation. This...

> > > > the _Literal_zero_is_expected function is used as an exported function. > > > > > > > > > The body of a `consteval` function should not...

Could someone please take a look at this patch when you have some free time? I understand it only needs to fix the crash issue.

> My general take on this issue: since msvc rejects this it would not be unreasonable to reject this in clang aswell for compatibility reasons and to avoid overall complexity...

> @GkvJwa My point is that the `ll` could already be considered ill formed - as explained in `Now what actually causes the issue`. But I agree that not only...

> => Thus the correct refusal pattern for LLC would be a function with a SEH (non CXX) personality like `__C_specific_handler` that It's okay, we can handle this simply first,...

> I would also like to note that using `try{}catch(...){}` instead of `__try{}__except(1){}` is a basically semantically equivalent workaround for this issue. On Windows, the latter is the SEH. The...

> @GkvJwa Regarding the failing test: I have to apologize. It seems there is some Borland C++ compatibility switch that I did not know about that allows these constructs to...