George-JL

@wizard97: I made some basic tests of your _strict-priorities branch_. Unfortunately, it didn't change anything in Scheduler behaviour, except it ignores _iterations_ argument. I made another experiment (with the master...

Aaron, I am sorry, but I am out for a long term travel having limited access to Internet and no access to my development/testing equipment. I'll be back at mid...

Aaron, back at my test site. The strict-priorities branch seems to work properly. Its only issue, I have detected, is that the Process parameter `iterations` is still ignored and the...

Sorry, I had a typo in my test prog. `iterations` also work fine!

Here is my test program [ProcessPrioritiesTest.ino.txt](https://github.com/wizard97/ArduinoProcessScheduler/files/1224804/ProcessPrioritiesTest.ino.txt) I still discovered a strange behavior: When I comment out the return statement on line 65, I get a garbage.

This tester gives better output: [ProcessPrioritiesTest.ino.txt](https://github.com/wizard97/ArduinoProcessScheduler/files/1225117/ProcessPrioritiesTest.ino.txt)

Yes. If I try to "Serial.print()" from onEnable() callback, the whole scheduling procedure breaks down. I suspect some timing interaction with the serial line. Tested on Adruino Nano v3 clone...

Yes. If I try to "Serial.print()" from onEnable

Everything works fine after your most recent patch. Yet another issue: `#define _MICROS_PRECISION` causes chaotic behavior even when `period` is multiplied by 1000. Changing wrong type of `getPeriod()` [Process.h line...