GCHQDev404
GCHQDev404
To answer a concern raised by the OP. See `NamedOperation#getNamedOperation` In here there is predicate logic used to examine if the user has access to the cached namedOperations. This is...
This logic exists in the OperationChain of ProxyStore. Consider renaming it.
A test needs to be written to examine if this bug still exists. There appears to be some issues with such as #2806 where proxy store is having issues deserialising....
This has been tested on a Rest service Federation Container with a Proxy to a Accumulo Store Container. And it works without issue. Testings is required for Java API but...
needs investigation, may have been fixed by other Alpha6 PR.
Yes. But some examples to think about with #2823 vs this ticket. example 1) FederatedStore receives an nonstandard operation, it simply forwards the operation (which was not able to be...
This will be pushed back to after v2 and as a high priority because this will make management of multiple graphs easier.
Due to test FederatedStoreCacheBackwardCompatibilityTest requiring backwards compatibility of the Cache I can't do smarter changes with the cache as required.
Have since decided the only break and migration required is the cache gets deleted and Graphs are re-added. the underlying data is of graphs will still persist.
repost: Requiring Further Discussion. It is likely that NamedOperations and NamedViews should follow the same changes. This likely should be achieved by a default caching mechanism (similar to FederatedStoreCache) which...