FarLab

Hi @andre-a-alves, are you still planning to work on this issue?

@nathanshammah @natestemen @Misty-W @jordandsullivan @cosenal We could try and understand the details of the paper and how to potentially implement it by discussing/brainstorming during the Tuesday coding sessions. I propose...

A small summary of TEM: 1) Given the circuit of interest, use a IC-POVM to perform tomography and obtain an estimate of the noisy density matrix $\tilde{\rho}$. 2) If the...

@bdg221 @Misty-W @natestemen After more extensive testing, it looks like the distribution we thought was the ideal one for the rotated RB circuits is wrong. For example, for an angle...

Looks like there is an analytic solution for the ideal distribution for the rotated rb circuits, which was expected looking at the empirical distribution. I have done the calculation for...

> Why do you only need to consider the 0,0 element? That is because we want the probability of measuring $\ket{0}$. You can see it in the expression for $p_0(\theta)$,...

Regarding the adding observable=None in the QSE, I thought the approach would be as follows. In this case, the executor returns a float (so it already returns some expectation value)....

The above approach looks to be incorrect, because $Tr(P_c\rho P_c^\dagger O) = \sum_{ij}c_ic_j^* Tr(M_i\rho M_j^\dagger O)$. So we need to compute for each $i,j$ the value $Tr(M_i\rho M_j^\dagger O)$.

Hi @bubakazouba, I know you have worked on implementing QSE in Mitiq and so I am curious about what you think about the above approach and if it makes sense...

Thanks @Death0004 for your comment. I need to read and and think in more detail about your approach, but I already have a few basic questions. 1) You mention that...