Yadi Cao

Imagine a scenario when user bumps a light elastic ball into a heavier elastic ball. This may be solved by super-sampling in the heavier ball, but will bring more troubles...

According to @maajor and @Eydcao , the current implementation requires a materialized `MPM_sovler_shell` before the importing into the python SOP. The advantage is that no need to redo ti.init() which...

Dump the results if the user would like to post-process in another software, pass the data to others who don't have Houdini (otherwise one can just use rog_geometry node). The...

The ultimate goal for ti-MPM in Houdini should be compatible with varying geometries. The particle emission can be handled by Houdini built-in SOPs. However, a general sdf/volume based collision is...

Support collider with moving velocity. If we would like to support scenario like below  **Ti-element end:** Modify the kernel in the `add_XXX_collider` functions, the key is to apply the...

The partial slipper collision is not yet supported in ti-element side (back-end). **Ti-Element end:** Consider treating the tangential relative velocity between the particle and the sphere like that in the...

Currently there lacks support for box collider, so we can't do some classic demos like this one  **Ti-element end:** support analytical box (surface type: sticky + slip + seperatable;...

Consider for each collider type, respectively, add a SOP node for visualization. I.E. if there is 1 box collider and 2 sphere colliders. It should add 1 box and 2...

https://github.com/taichi-dev/taichi_elements/blob/2451c9843a7058a1edcd10e448460f4ba509ecc4/demo/benchmark.py#L15 As described in the reference and title. This file is not included in repo or `download_ply.py` script. Thanks, Yadi