David Lindley
David Lindley
The current ruleset incorrectly checks MR_capm.SP.2 rule. The attached PDF shows how the rule should be applied. [capm_rules.pdf](https://github.com/efabless/caravel/files/14949772/capm_rules.pdf)
Hi Marwan, All the Skywater documentation is pretty clear that met3_bottom_plate is Met3 AND capm grown by the minimum enclosure of capm by Met3 (0.14um). Hi Kareem, I think the...
Marwan, Kareem, I verified the following with Skywater. 1. met3_bot_plate is defined as (capm:dg AND met3:dg) sized by 0.14um 2. the capm spacing (MR_capm.SP.1) needs to be satisfied regardless of...
Yes. On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 7:45 AM Kareem Farid ***@***.***> wrote: > Thanks David. Should we assume that similar rules apply for cap2m? > > — > Reply...
Two psdm rules are being flagged on some proprietary memory macro IP. 1. psdm.4 : min. spacing across areaid:ce : 0.38um I think this rule is not applied correctly since...
As of 2024/May/08 these issues exist in the rules 1. mcon straddling the areaid:core is truncated by the rules 2. I have a couple examples in Chipalooza_1 where the a...
Deferring past April.
We think this is solved but not verified. The LVS check we are implementing should catch this issue. We can close when the LVS issue closes.
Only need to check production code matches offline development scripts. LVL of both flows output.
Waiver added, waiting for LVS to go into production.