David-Le-Nir

My concern was initially that _add_extra_option_ says in its doc that it is equivalent to manually using _app.config.needs_extra_options_. Thus to configure my document I preferred to use the api way...

Hello, I first tried as you said but I was annoyed that I'd have to take this new field into account in each directive (e.g. needtable) to exclude the need...

I understand your point for the later code. My 2 cents: I am checking some values in my needs to raise functional/semantic warnings if required. Prior to use the variant...

would removing the nodes as it is done for hidden needs be sufficient ? or it is only about the display ?

Thanks for the explanation. I started a PR but, I don't know why, I do not manage to run tests. Anyway, adding a field to the needs is ok. I...

Do you mean if the if-builder accepted tags it could greatly replace the only ? (I didn't check the code, sorry) Maybe adding the boolean field at the need level...

> Maybe a small, new sphinx extension Sphinx-If could be the better solution. Taking the code from if-builder, extending it to support sphinx-tags, and it's done :) Do you think...

Hello, I implemented (for the moment locally in our gitlab, not on github) the "only-tags" and "only-builder" directives based on what was made in sphinx-simplepdf. This works pretty well but...

Hello, I miss this feature too. Is it planned for an implementation ? Thanks for your great work

I understand accessing many internet pages each with different page structure is maybe too complex. In my case, I am using multiple documents referencing each others. They are hosted privately...