Dani Somoza

Hi @bradyjoestar for that `_batchHeader` struct defined in this contract `0x91A5D806BA73d0AA4bFA9B318126dDE60582e92a`: you can use a value like this: ``` [123,"0xAAAAFF", 1234, 1234, "0xAAAAFF", "0xAAAAFF"] ``` ![Captura de pantalla 2023-05-24 a...

Hi @W3stside sorry for the late response. For this tuple ``` StructType { address token; uint256 id; } ``` You can use a value like this: ``` ["0x57CB13cbef735FbDD65f5f2866638c546464E45F",1] ``` but...

Hi @kritik-sah Thanks for sharing all the context and code! Based on [your Tenderly simulation](https://dashboard.tenderly.co/public/safe/safe-apps/simulator/7747cabf-a9e2-4705-a54e-fa1ec2f45b8a) it looks like batching transactions (e.g. `approve` + `withdrawCollateral`) is failing because of [this Guard...

And just an additional note: While whitelisting the MultiSend contract and its multiSend(bytes) function would unblock batched transactions, doing so effectively bypasses the purpose of having a guard in the...