CliveEvans
CliveEvans
Any idea when you will be compatible?
Looks good but we have no build status. What happened to Travis?
I'm happy to come back on board ;-)
> I had to do some changes in #23 to get the Travis build to work for my fork > https://travis-ci.com/github/runeflobakk/java-8-matchers Ok, let's get that one in first then. _looks...
It's a good question. I certainly still use it, but no longer have the keys to do much to it, since I left. Tagging @bruceeddy and @jahed as other people...
This is because the `both` matcher, from core, is causing both matchers to be checked, one after the other, and therefore the stream is being reused after it has been...
Neither of those should pass if we're going to stick with normal hamcrest syntax: http://hamcrest.org/JavaHamcrest/javadoc/1.3/org/hamcrest/Matchers.html#contains(E...) `assertThat(Stream.of("a", "b", "c"), contains( "a", "b", "c"))` should pass. `assertThat(Stream.of("a", "b", "c"), contains( "b", "c",...
I started work on it and got a little hung up trying to make the output look nice. It turns out describing matchers don't really generate language that neatly strings...
> I am thinking the best time is when at least half of our users have moved to Jackson 3. Isn't that the same as saying the best time is...
Once I got over the surprise breaking changes, everything works fine for me here. Thanks for listening and updating.