Arthur

Hello all, I'm here for the same reason: enhancing Schema.org vocabulary to be able to better fit the needs of marking up Real Estate properties with all posible details. One...

Hi Martin, Thanks for the fast reply. Can you please provide me a correct usage for schema:additionalProperty to be able to succesfully fit in within the schema:Residence? In this way,...

Hi Martin, Your proposed method It's working great, it validates all the amenities implemented with schema:PropertyValue: https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3v9ds/6okx As for the Google Rich Snippet Testing Tool, to what bug do you...

Hi guys, I need a little bit of help again: I can't seem to find a correct implementation for a price of a Residence with the schema:PriceSpecification: - the problem...

Thank you guys, I'll try to implement it now in this way.

Hi jvandriel (I'm sorry to call you on your nick-name but don't know your name), The example you provided does not validate either, nor by itself, neither implemented in my...

Thanks Jarno. @danbri Dan do you have any ideea when Google Structured Data Markup Tool will recognize and support multi type entities? The Real Estate can't be marked up correctly...

Sure @danbri , through "Real Estate" I didn't mean any specific companies products, but the "Real Estate Properties" products in general, focusing on marking them up correctly through schema.org markup...

Hi @WeaverStever , Thank you for your observation, I have modified the elements @id to be unique and bulletproof. My example it's the simplest there is which can be used....

Hi @fthobe I support the same - re-organizing/correcting/expanding the RealEstateListing vocabulary. Please note my tech comment from the other post with the proposed enhancements: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/241#issuecomment-803559795 I do believe that RealEstateListing...