Yi Duan
Yi Duan
> +1 Would like to see this as well. + 10000x. No-Builder-Support will definitely limit your libs' applicability and practicability
Thanks for the reply. As you mentioned, sonic has its own problems regarding compatibility, such as our JIT system can work on assumptions about how the Go runtime operates, or...
> **The latest updates on your projects**. Learn more about [Vercel for Git ↗︎](https://vercel.link/github-learn-more) > > Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC) > **cloudwego** ❌ Failed ([Inspect](https://vercel.com/cloudwego/cloudwego/BZvwY43G6SKVPS5TB9ZySJR5xTdp)) May 1, 2024...
On account of practical business, It seems that `sonic.Get()` combining with `Node.Map()`, `Node.Array()` and `Node.Interface()` can meet most usages in Bytedance (So does Json-Iterator)? As for convenience, maybe support it...
As far as as know, there are not strong enough needs for doing that
在做了.jpg
at present, set GOARCH=amd64 and use Rosatta is enough (https://github.com/bytedance/sonic#compatibility). For better performance and really support `ARM` arch in future, we still have a lot of jobs to do: 1....
Didn't get what you mean. give more explaination
v1.9没问题？
所以1.8.x没问题？