Antibrumm

I think that this is already supported by the current implementation. You don't really need to change anything. Have you tried to use the pattern `*.firstName` before your modifications?

Sorry for not answering earlier. Work is a bitch sometimes :) I think this contribution is pretty nice. Just one request. Could you use the double-star pattern? `**.firstName` This would...

Could you please share the reason why include should be retired? In my project we use include quite often as it allows us to create fragments that show a correct...

Thanks Daniel for the explanation. I see your point on the confusion part. I also needed to write some simple tests to get the differences between the include modes. The...

I played around a little and found a quite nice approach to hide my previous controlling code from the html templates: This allows any number of fallback templates. The example...

Take a look at issue #264 (Feature Request: Allow fallback templates for th:include, etc...) Probably you can use my approach I wrote in the comment to achieve what you want...

Just stumbled upon this issue and wanted to add my 2 cents. I see two solutions that could be interesting in cleaning up those "unreadable" expressions: - Create a new...

I ran into exactly this problem too and think I found a better solution that does not require dirtying the context: - The general idea is to put the scheduler...