AndreasIgelCC
AndreasIgelCC
As far as I know, it is not supported yet. @kishikawakatsumi: Do you agree?
Thank you for your answer and your thoughts. The last days I had some time to look on this. It really seams not to be easy, because the whole store...
Thank you for the response, the explanations and the ideas. The 1:N connection between rule and violation I have been aware of. From my point of view this is considered...
This difference to #425 is, that we do not want to have it imported as metric. It should be imported in code smell format and should be linked to the...
Thank you for your response. I guess with #749 and #750 all requirements would be realized. Then it would be only a specific JSON format of ViolationStore and could be...
The Idea with the test descriptor sounds good (not used that before). I could have a deeper look on that. That would be really a unique identifier. But I would...
Would it be possible, that you @slawekjaranowski have a look on that? Seems like, you do not need the parameter 'localRepository' (see https://github.com/mojohaus/license-maven-plugin/commit/fe03c6da6db4da4cb8e066e21479ca598b0c97d6, but fulltext-search still show it), so it...
Is that switch planned and do you have time to do that? Or do you need help with it?
Same still in version 2.25 of that plugin. Is it possible to have an update there? Could I support somehow?
> There appears to be a monstrous AI generated PR for Jakarta migration that I assume is related, but I'm not sure you can call it a plan: > >...