Alex Potter

Hi there 😃 First off, apologies it's taken me so long to respond to this - it's been a busy year so far! The syntax you're suggesting here was what...

# Proposal In light of the above, I'd like to propose the introduction of a new `.ruleForTransformed` method which allows specifying validation rules on a transformed property value. This will...

The `.ruleForTransformed` proposal has been implemented in [v2.3.0](https://github.com/AlexJPotter/fluentvalidation-ts/releases/tag/v2.3.0) 🎉

Hi there - thanks for your feedback, and sorry it's taken me so long to get back to you on this! Adding greater detail and flexibility to the shape of...

Hi @celluj34 - this behaviour was chosen to be consistent with the C# library FluentValidation. See [this GitHub issue](https://github.com/FluentValidation/FluentValidation/issues/2030) for further context. FluentValidation has since moved to a `PrecisionScale` method...

Hi @chandrubk - it's a good point, I'll have a think about whether there are some built-in validators we can support for `Date` objects. As a workaround for now you...

Hi @rwb196884 - can you please provide some reproduction steps or further context? I'm afraid it's going to be very hard to diagnose the issue without more information!

Hi @leherv - thanks for your feedback 😃 > The only problem I am having right now is that it is not very convenient to check if the result is...