A200K

That's actually how I did it in my first implementation: https://github.com/A200K/IDA-Pro-SigMaker/blob/2fa5492953f3ca9fc60bceed315627183545f97f/IDA%20Pro%20SigMaker/Main.cpp#L50 I didn't think it would do that much of a difference and I wanted to clean up the code,...

@belmeopmenieuwesim I implemented your fix in my latest release. Would you mind comparing the performance improvement to your SIMD optimization? What exactly did you do? It was really unusably slow....

That‘s really cool! I didn’t think there was that much room for improvement, compared to the IDA API. I won‘t be able to work on the project for a few...

@GCHE1 „Copy selected Bytes“ option should be the closest thing to „make signature from selected code“ That‘s odd. You could try the „Operand types“ button and uncheck everything except for...

Seems fine to me, to be honest. Might change the default settings for the operands in the future though.

Yeah, there was already a pull request for adaption to IDA 9 SDK: https://github.com/A200K/IDA-Pro-SigMaker/pull/13 It‘s on a separate branch for now, because I wasn‘t able to check downwards compatibility yet

Well, you could - check "Continue when leaving function scope" under "Options", or - try to generate an XREF signature, because the function you are trying to create a signature...

That means that the signature is getting too long / the function code you are trying to make a signature for is too short. The easiest fix is to check...

@Evasion3356 To be fair, it is hard to cover all edge cases and do the "right" thing automatically. Some manual adjustment and different approach finding will be necessary from time...

@Evasion3356 That is very true, I somehow didn't think about that case. Thank you for the input! It might be worth to automate this process, or define an upper limit...