Youri Westerman
Youri Westerman
@Nyholm @frankdejonge He also explains that in the issue: https://github.com/thephpleague/flysystem/issues/1323 I would kind of like this feature as well, as after "upgrading" to version 2 I lost the ability of...
Great! Making this available as a SDK extension makes it flexible and re-usable. :smile: I'm wondering if it would be a good idea to have WebkitGTK as a separate extension...
> on a higher level, why is this x86_64 only? In the past the Qt Creator builds for other architectures would fail on the build platform because of resource limitations,...
They couldn't in the past, but I have zero problems with trying it again as long as there is some way of getting support if the worker fails for reasons...
bot, build org.freedesktop.Sdk.Extension.qt5
> I think making an Sdk extension for one app to consume may be questionable especially if you are making a separate [stub app extension](https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/3014) to use this one. Just...
> > It usually has to start somewhere, there are more and more separate Qt components showing up on flathub, which could be reused from the Sdk extension. > >...
bot, build org.freedesktop.Sdk.Extension.qt5
> I wonder of the usefulness of this at all for anything. In general the build isn't relocatable, and we alredy have issues with QtWebEngine in a different prefix (pyside...
bot, build org.freedesktop.Sdk.Extension.qt5